By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer Mon Apr 28, 5:47 PM ET
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is undermining the Environmental Protection
Agency's ability to determine health dangers of toxic chemicals by
letting nonscientists have a bigger — often secret — role, congressional
investigators say in a report obtained by The Associated Press.
The administration's decision to give the Defense Department and other
agencies an early role in the process adds to years of delay in acting on
harmful chemicals and jeopardizes the program's credibility, the Government
Accountability Office concluded.
At issue is the EPA's screening of chemicals used in everything from
household products to rocket fuel to determine if they pose serious risk of
cancer or other
illnesses.
A new review process begun by the White House in 2004 is adding more speed
bumps for EPA scientists, the GAO said in its report, which will be the subject
of a Senate Environment Committee hearing Tuesday. A formal policy effectively
doubling the number of steps was adopted two weeks ago.
Cancer risk
assessments for nearly a dozen major chemicals are now years overdue, the
GAO said, blaming the new multiagency reviews for some of the delay. The EPA,
for example, had promised to prepare assessments on 10 major toxic chemicals for
external peer review by the end of 2007, but only two reached that stage.
GAO investigators said extensive involvement by EPA managers, White House
budget officials and other agencies has eroded the independence of EPA
scientists charged with determining the health risks posed by chemicals.
The Pentagon, the
Energy Department, NASA and other
agencies — all of which could be severely affected by EPA risk findings — are
being allowed to participate "at almost every step in the assessment process,"
said the GAO.
Those agencies, their private contractors and manufacturers of the chemicals
face restrictions and major cleanup requirements, depending on the EPA's
scientific determinations.
"By law the EPA must protect our families from dangerous chemicals," said
Sen. Barbara
Boxer, D-Calif., the Senate committee's chairman. "Instead, they're
protecting the chemical companies."
The EPA's risk assessment process "never was perfect," Boxer said in an
interview Monday. "But at least it put the scientists up front. Now the
scientists are being shunted aside."
The GAO said many of the deliberations over risks posed by specific chemicals
"occur in what amounts to a black box" of secrecy because the White House claims
they are private executive branch deliberations.
Such secrecy "reduces the credibility of the ... assessments and hinders the
EPA's ability to manage them," the GAO report said.
The White House said the GAO is wrong in suggesting that the EPA has lost
control in assessing the health risks posed by toxic chemicals.
"Only EPA has the authority to finalize an EPA assessment," Kevin F. Neyland,
deputy administrator of the White House budget office's Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, wrote in response to the GAO. He called the interagency
process "a dialogue that helps to ensure the quality" of the reviews.
One EPA scientist with extensive knowledge of the changes in the agency's
risk assessment policies ridiculed the claim that the EPA still has the final
say.
"Unless there is concurrence by other agencies, ... things don't go forward.
It means we stop what we are doing," said the scientist, speaking on condition
of anonymity because of fear of endangering his career.
"The (EPA) scientists feel as if they have lost complete control of the
process, that it's been taken over by the White House and that they're calling
the shots," the scientist said.
The GAO investigation focused on the EPA's computerized database, known as
IRIS — the Integrated Risk Information System. It contains data on the human
health effects of exposure to some 540 toxic chemicals in the environment. New
chemicals are being proposed constantly for inclusion under a complicated
assessment process that can take five years or more.
After years of stops and starts, the GAO said, the EPA has yet to determine
carcinogen risks for a number of major chemicals such as:
_Naphthalene, a chemical used in rocket fuel as well as in manufacturing
commercial products such as mothballs, dyes and insecticides.
_Trichloroethylene, or TCE, a widely used industrial degreasing agent.
_Perchloroethylene, or "perc," a chemical used in dry cleaning, metal
degreasing and making chemical products.
_Formaldehyde, a colorless, flammable gas used to making building materials.
Environmentalists say these chemicals have been widely found at military
bases and Superfund sites and in soil, lakes, streams and groundwater.
The findings, after an 18-month investigation by the congressional watchdog
agency, come at a time of growing criticism from members of Congress and
health and environmental advocates over alleged political interference in the
government's science activities.
Last week, a confidential survey by an advocacy group of EPA scientists
showed more than half of the 1,600 respondents worried about political pressure
in their work.